Anyone who follows a religion should be respected for that. As part of a society that allows the right to freedom of expression anyone is indeed entitled to have and express their religious beliefs. Further, those with religious differences can peacefully accept differing points of view from others. We can ‘agree to disagree.’
However, it has been said by some that religions are nothing more than mass mind control programmes, that there’s is a far bigger picture involved that most people can’t see, which I will explain…
-Bearing this in mind here are7 things, a list of flaws, inconsistencies and criticisms… to challenge the authenticity of religion.
Each religion has all the answers and claims to explain everything, but with so little evidence religion has to be based on faith rather than hard facts, documentary evidence… i.e. the truth. This is why there are so many conflicting views.
Following on from 1, no matter if it’s a major religion or some small supported off beat cult the followers always think that theirs is the one that’s right in spite of the conflicting views. Hence the reason why religious debate stirs so many knee-jerk reflex responses based on emotion and programming rather than fact.
Religion wants you to follow the white line made by the teachings and texts… In others words just accept what the religion has to say without any real questioning or critical thought… In for example Christianity you’re told that you’re born a sinner and have to spend your time bowing down to a judgemental, angry and jealous God…
Over the known history of humankind religion has had quite an effect of instilling fear. Fear of being punished and going to Hell is one of the earliest indoctrinations which indeed normally start in early childhood.
Following on from 4, control by respect as oppose to control by fear is fine. But religion tries to give the effect that it’s based on love when it isn’t. It’s based on fear.
The dogma can indeed give rise to being deeply stuck-in-one’s ways; thoughts, attitudes and opinions, emotions or identity, leading to fundamentalism. This therefore makes religion one of the most dangerous threats to mankind. Religious fundamentalism has caused so many wars and conflicts. Certain individuals in high places have secretly stirred religious fundamentalism to manipulate the fundamentalists into war for power, profit and political gain…
It has been said that religion uses spirituality as an excuse. It is a controlling system created by those in high places for power, profit and political gain. It’s used to manipulate the masses into passivity…
-Spirituality should be what religion is about but in conclusion from the above, it’s not.
Therefore, do we really need religion?
Heaven, Hell and Reincarnation: Heaven and Hell. Even before really looking into it for many years I considered the whole heaven and hell business to be suspect.
I suspected that it was an invention to control and manipulate the masses into pacification. One again another case of the masses accepting authority without really questioning.
The idea that when you die you’re going to be sent to an eternity of either; bliss where there’s harps and hosannas or an eternity of damnation, tar barrels and toasting folks is quite illogical to me. What about the in between of these 2 extremes? Surely, when people die, if there is a judgement day, in fairness, shouldn’t there be at least some sent somewhere in between?!